When there is a question whether an act was accidental or intentional, 1[or done with a particular knowledge or intention,]the fact that such act formed part of a series of similar occurrences, in each of which the person doing the act was concerned, is relevant. Illustrations (a) A is accused of burning down his house in order to obtain money for which it is insured. The facts that A lived in several houses successively each of which he insured, in each of which a fire occurred, and after each of which fires A received payment from a different insurance office, are relevant, as tending to show that the fires were not accidental. (b) A is employed to receive money from the debtors of B. It is A's duty to make entries in a book showing the amounts received by him. He makes an entry showing that on a particular occasion he received less than he really did receive. The question is, whether this false entry was accidental or intentional. The facts that other entries made by A in the same book are false, and that the false entry is in each case in favour of A, are relevant. (c) A is accused of fraudulently delivering to B a counterfeit rupee. The question is, whether the delivery of the rupee was accidental. The facts that, soon before or soon after the delivery to B, A delivered counterfeit rupees to C, D and E are relevant, as showing that the delivery to B was not accidental
<span style="margin-left:15px;"></span>When there is a question whether an act was accidental or intentional, <sup>1</sup>[or done with a particular knowledge or intention,]the fact that such act formed part of a series of similar occurrences, in each of which the person doing the act was concerned, is relevant.<br> <span style="margin-left:15px;"></span><i>Illustrations</i><br> <span style="margin-left:15px;"></span>(a) A is accused of burning down his house in order to obtain money for which it is insured.<br> <span style="margin-left:15px;"></span>The facts that A lived in several houses successively each of which he insured, in each of which a fire occurred, and after each of which fires A received payment from a different insurance office, are relevant, as tending to show that the fires were not accidental.<br> <span style="margin-left:15px;"></span>(b) A is employed to receive money from the debtors of B. It is A's duty to make entries in a book showing the amounts received by him. He makes an entry showing that on a particular occasion he received less than he really did receive.<br> <span style="margin-left:15px;"></span>The question is, whether this false entry was accidental or intentional.<br> The facts that other entries made by A in the same book are false, and that the false entry is in each case in favour of A, are relevant.<br> <span style="margin-left:15px;"></span>(c) A is accused of fraudulently delivering to B a counterfeit rupee.<br> <span style="margin-left:15px;"></span>The question is, whether the delivery of the rupee was accidental.<br> <span style="margin-left:15px;"></span>The facts that, soon before or soon after the delivery to B, A delivered counterfeit rupees to C, D and E are relevant, as showing that the delivery to B was not accidental<br>