Lawgist.Download the App Now!
Get our Android app for fast and offline Access.
The burden of proof in a suit or proceeding lies on that person who would fail if no evidence at all were given on either side. Illustration (a) A sues B for land of which B is in possession, and which, as A asserts, was left to A by the will of C, B's father. If no evidence were given on either side, B would be entitled to retain his possession. Therefore the burden of proof is on A. (b) A sues B for money due on a bond. The execution of the bond is admitted, but B says that it was obtained by fraud, which A denies. If no evidence were given on either side, A would succeed, as the bond is not disputed and the fraud is not proved. Therefore the burden of proof is on B.
<span style="margin-left:15px;"></span>The burden of proof in a suit or proceeding lies on that person who would fail if no evidence at all were given on either side.<br> <span style="margin-left:15px;"></span> <i>Illustration</i><br> <span style="margin-left:15px;"></span> (a) A sues B for land of which B is in possession, and which, as A asserts, was left to A by the will of C, B's father.<br> <span style="margin-left:15px;"></span> If no evidence were given on either side, B would be entitled to retain his possession.<br> <span style="margin-left:15px;"></span> Therefore the burden of proof is on A.<br> <span style="margin-left:15px;"></span> (b) A sues B for money due on a bond.<br> <span style="margin-left:15px;"></span> The execution of the bond is admitted, but B says that it was obtained by fraud, which A denies.<br> <span style="margin-left:15px;"></span> If no evidence were given on either side, A would succeed, as the bond is not disputed and the fraud is not proved.<br> <span style="margin-left:15px;"></span> Therefore the burden of proof is on B. <br><br>