Lawgist102On whom burden of proof lies
The burden of proof in a suit or proceeding lies on that person who would fail if no evidence at all were given on either side.
Illustration
(a) A sues B for land of which B is in possession, and which, as A asserts, was left to A by the will of C, B's father.
If no evidence were given on either side, B would be entitled to retain his possession.
Therefore the burden of proof is on A.
(b) A sues B for money due on a bond.
The execution of the bond is admitted, but B says that it was obtained by fraud, which A denies.
If no evidence were given on either side, A would succeed, as the bond is not disputed and the fraud is not proved.
Therefore the burden of proof is on B.
Download our fully-offline, High speed android app.- Click here
- 101 Burden of proof
- 102 On whom burden of proof lies
- 103 Burden of proof as to particular fact
- 104 Burden of proving fact to be proved to make evidence admissible
- 105 Burden of proving that case of accused comes within exceptions
- 106 Burden of proving fact especially within knowledge
- 107 Burden of proving death of person known to have been alive within thirty years
- 108 Burden of proving that person is alive who has not been heard of for seven years
- 109 Burden of proof as to relationship in the cases of partners, landlord and tenant, principal and agent
- 110 Burden of proof as to ownership
- 111 Proof of good faith in transactions where one party is in relation of active confidence
- 111A Presumption as to certain offences
- 112 Birth during marriage, conclusive proof of legitimacy
- 113 Proof of cession of territory
- 113A Presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman
- 113B Presumption as to dowry death
- 114 Court may presume existence of certain facts
- 114A Presumption as to absence of consent in certain prosecution for rap
