Lawgist logo - L! Lawgist.
The Customs Act

123Burden of proof in certain cases

1[(1) Where any goods to which this section applies are seized under this Act in the reasonable belief that they are smuggled goods, the burden of proving that they are not smuggled goods shall be--

(a) in a case where such seizure is made from the possession of any person,--

(i) on the person from whose possession the goods were seized; and

(ii) if any person, other than the person from whose possession the goods were seized, claims to be the owner thereof, also on such other person;

(b) in any other case, on the person, if any, who claims to be the owner of the goods so seized.]

(2) This section shall apply to gold, 2[and manufactures thereof], watches, and any other class of goods which the Central Government may by notification in the Official Gazette specify.

Download our fully-offline, High speed android app.- Click here

1. Subs. by Act 36 of 1973, s. 4, for sub-section (1) (w.e.f. 1-9-1973).

2. Subs. by Act 40 of 1989, s. 2, for , "diamonds, manufactures of gold or diamonds" (w.e.f. 26-10-1989).

Download the App Now!

Get our Android app for fast and offline Access.

Get it on Google Play
Lawgist is not a law firm and does not engage in the practice of law or provide legal advice or legal representation. All information, software, services, and comments provided on this site are for informational and self-help purposes only and are not intended to be a substitute for professional legal advice. Use of this site is subject to our Terms and Conditions, Disclaimer, and Privacy Policy.About Us Made in ♥ with India, Internet and Lots of Courtroom Dramas