We heard you! Soon we are bringing you the biggest update yet with Updated & New acts, all Central and State acts, the Constitution of India, and a dedicated Mobile App! 🚀
(1) If, at the time of delivery of any
judgment or final order disposing of any judicial proceeding, a Court of Session or Magistrate of the first
class expresses an opinion to the effect that any witness appearing in such proceeding had knowingly or
wilfully given false evidence or had fabricated false evidence with the intention that such evidence should
be used in such proceeding, it or he may, if satisfied that it is necessary and expedient in the interest of
justice that the witness should be tried summarily for giving or fabricating, as the case may be, false
evidence, take cognizance of the offence and may, after giving the offender a reasonable opportunity of
showing cause why he should not be punished for such offence, try such offender summarily and sentence
him to imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months, or to fine which may extend to one
thousand rupees, or with both.
(2) In every such case the Court shall follow, as nearly as may be practicable, the procedure prescribed
for summary trials.
(3) Nothing in this section shall affect the power of the Court to make a complaint under section 379
for the offence, where it does not choose to proceed under this section.
(4) Where, after any action is initiated under sub-section (1), it is made to appear to the Court of Session
or Magistrate of the first class that an appeal or an application for revision has been preferred or filed against
the judgment or order in which the opinion referred to in that sub-section has been expressed, it or he shall
stay further proceedings of the trial until the disposal of the appeal or the application for revision, as the
case may be, and thereupon the further proceedings of the trial shall abide by the results of the appeal or
application for revision.
Download our fully-offline, High speed android app.- Click here